Welcome to DCD, home of the number one construction magazine!
ABOUT DCD    THE MAGAZINE    D4COST    CONTACT    HOME
Welcome to DCD.com!
     

 Current Issue
 Click here to
 read the issue.
Click Here To Access The DCD Archives™
Subscriber Login

Content/Departments
   Current Issue
   Issue Archive
   Specifiers Spotlights
   Building Products Revue
   TradeWinds
   Technical Articles
   Insights
   Case Studies
   DCD Sq. Ft. Cost Guides

   Cost Trends


Advertising
   Media Kit

Subscriptions
   Free Subscription
   Subscribe
   DCD E-News Subscription

D4COST Software


 


Click Here to
Subscribe Today
for Your FREE
DCD Magazine
Subscription

Striking a Winning Balance: Can You Overprotect Your Building?
By Barry Reid, LEED AP Sustainability Manager, Georgia-Pacific LLC

Building a truly sustainable building requires the deft touch of a racecar crew chief. To ensure his vehicle is competitive, the chief oversees a variety of disparate but integrated efforts — finely-tuning the engine, tinkering with the suspension, maximizing tire wear, analyzing track conditions and applying aerodynamic principles to determine the final set-up. And to cross the finish line, these and countless other key factors — like the skill of the driver — must strike the proper balance.

So, too, the creation of a winning structure, one that blends moisture management, energy efficiency, indoor air quality and countless other factors to result in a champagne cork-popping building.

But ours has typically been an industry of independents – designers, builders, manufacturers — who are experts in their own field but not necessarily accustomed to working as a team to achieve the most sustainable building possible. How do we guarantee in this demanding era of environmental acronyms – with LEED® in the lead — that we work with pit-crew precision throughout the design and construction process?

Clearly, we must continue to build our buildings and homes to be increasingly more energy efficient. This requires superior moisture management, durability, and indoor air quality strategies to make certain that buildings perform well into the future. But in doing so, the challenges are many – and they must be addressed in order to orchestrate a balance when designing, constructing and maintaining sustainable buildings.

Let’s consider a common but rarely considered moisture management conundrum – can you actually over-protect your building?

With improvements in construction practices, building envelopes have become “tight”— meaning builders are doing a much better job of preventing moisture and air from infiltrating a building. But what happens when it does – say through a leaky window, an improper flashing detail, or a misplaced vapor retarder? The same system that works to prevent moisture from accumulating in the wall can serve to keep moisture from getting out, thus actually increasing the likelihood of moisture- and mold-related damage.

Conversely, the misconception that buildings should “breathe” can mean there is little control over the infiltration of air and moisture being brought into the building. If this happens in a well-insulated wall (chances are we won’t ever see less-insulated walls), moisture can accumulate. Does anyone really want to live in the drafty, leaky log cabins of our ancestors? Although they certainly were able to dry out quickly after a storm and didn’t grow mold, they were not very comfortable.

Properly installed and secured vapor retarders and air barriers are currently the tools used in reducing the likelihood that moisture can enter a wall assembly. But several factors should be addressed before choosing what grade and where to install vapor retarders, including the climate zone and the building’s use and tenants. When working with vapor retarders, the objective is keeping moisture migration in check, keeping in mind the fact that moisture, water vapor always moves from the warm side of building assemblies to the cold side.

The critical factors when deciding where to install vapor retarders is to address the climate where the building is located. For example, in a warm climate, like Miami, the warm side of a building is always the outside, so you would install the vapor retarder toward the exterior walls. In Boston, it’s reversed… the warm side is the inside, so you would address moisture movement by installing the vapor retarder toward the interior walls.

Of course, the reputation-enhancing rewards for getting it done right can be substantial. Even though moisture control is referenced either directly or indirectly in Energy Efficiency, Resource and Materials, and Indoor Environmental Quality sections in virtually every green building code, standard and program, there are many ways to make mistakes that actually make things worse. One classic example of a mistake having to do with moisture management is installing vinyl wallpaper over wallboard in a hot humid climate… the result – a high risk for mold growth! Another is putting vapor retarders on the inside wall of a structure in a hot humid climate.

The point is – there are multiple paths and trade-offs to ensure moisture control is addressed. It is important to look at the climate zone, the building orientation and landscaping, the architecture-and shape of the roof and building, the windows and doors, the day lighting, the HVAC system and how it is sized, and the material choices that have been made before making a final determination.

Finding the right path that strikes a balance that is appropriate for that particular structure and its long-term performance means that you – and your building – will land in Victory Lane.

About the Author: Mr. Reid has 22 years experience in the Building Products industry. He is currently Sustainability Manager for Georgia-Pacific LLC Building Products where he serves as Subject Matter Expert on green building codes, standards, and programs. He works with product development and management teams integrating sustainable and building science principles into Georgia-Pacific products and processes. Current green building activities include being a member of the Gypsum Association’s Ad-Hoc Committee on Sustainability and is the chair of the American Wood Council’s Green Building-Codes and Standards Technical sub-committee. Mr. Reid has a B.A. from the University of Oregon, College of Business Administration. You can contact Mr. Reed at bsreid@gapac.com.


©2015 Copyright DC&D Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. | DCD Construction Magazine | Email: webmaster@dcd.com