Welcome to DCD, home of the number one construction magazine!
ABOUT DCD    THE MAGAZINE    D4COST    CONTACT    HOME
Welcome to DCD.com!
     

 Current Issue
 Click here to
 read the issue.
Click Here To Access The DCD Archives™
Subscriber Login

Content/Departments
   Current Issue
   Issue Archive
   Specifiers Spotlights
   Building Products Revue
   TradeWinds
   Technical Articles
   Insights
   Case Studies
   DCD Sq. Ft. Cost Guides

   Cost Trends


Advertising
   Media Kit

Subscriptions
   Free Subscription
   Subscribe
   DCD E-News Subscription

 

D4COST Software



 


Click Here to
Subscribe Today
for Your FREE
DCD Magazine
Subscription

Field Testing Dampens Leak Problems
By: John Lewis

Water penetration through exterior walls is a serious concern of architects, product manufacturers, contractors and building owners. Fenestration products typically receive the greatest scrutiny.

However, product design is not so likely to be the cause of leakage problems. Fenestration products that meet the code-mandated standard AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440-05, Standard/Specification for Windows, Doors, and Unit Skylights and its predecessors must pass ASTM E547 and/or E331 water leakage tests of increasing stringency depending on their Performance Grade (PG) and Performance Class. Laboratory water penetration spray tests simulate wind-driven rain by simultaneously applying air pressure at 15 percent of Design Pressure (DP) for all window performance classes except AW, for which it is 20 percent of the DP. The AAMA Certification label verifies conformance with this standard and is the foundation for water penetration resistance.

Unfortunately, meeting such standards and testing of factory-made window, door and unit skylight products does not account for leakage due to poor installation, the more likely culprit when leaks occur. In addition, water penetration at or near a fenestration product opening may actually originate from the surrounding construction.

Contractors are well advised to verify the actual installed performance of fenestration products during construction and prior to occupancy of a building. Situations can also arise where a forensic investigation of an actual leakage problem is useful to pinpoint a leakage path. Properly applied field testing serves both purposes.

Newly-Installed Fenestration
The recognized field test method for verifying water penetration resistance and air infiltration of newly installed operable windows and doors is the updated AAMA 502-08, Voluntary Specification for Field Testing of Newly Installed Fenestration Products. A sister standard, AAMA 503-08 offers the same protocols for testing of newly installed storefronts, curtain walls and sloped glazing systems. Both are based on ASTM E783, Standard Test Method for Field Measurement of Air Leakage Through Installed Exterior Windows and Doors, and ASTM E1105, Standard Test Method for Field Determination of Water Penetration of Installed Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Uniform or Cyclic Static Air Pressure Difference, and both require that the testing be performed during construction and prior to occupancy of a building, but in no case later than six months after installation.

Per AAMA 502-08, a temporary sealed test chamber is applied to the interior side of at least three of a project’s installed windows or doors, then sealed and pressurized to establish a specified pressure differential across the product and the rough opening that simulates wind pressure. Installation of the test chamber to the exterior is also provided as an alternative method. Tests are conducted at a static test pressure equal to two-thirds of the water test pressure (WTP) prescribed in AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440, but not less than 91 Pa (1.9 psf). Water is then sprayed against the outside surface from a calibrated spray rack. The entire installed fenestration product is tested, including the frame, corners, panning, subframe/receptor system, etc. and the adjacent substrate including the perimeter seals. To pass the test, there can be no penetration of uncontrolled water beyond a plane parallel to the innermost edges of the product.

Performing the tests as soon as practical on the job site can help determine if manufacturing, installation and/or perimeter sealing problems are present and aid in implementing corrective action before a substantial portion of the project is completed. Access to the windows for proper testing must be provided before the openings are finished with drywall, trim, stools, etc.

A recommended Short Form Field Testing specification allows the architect/specifier to prescribe the test pressure for both air infiltration and water resistance, depending on the location and wind exposure of the specific project (as determined using the principles of ASCE/SEI 7–05, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures).

Forensic Investigation
If the source of the water leakage cannot be determined per AAMA 502 or 503, or if leakage becomes evident after occupancy or more than six months after installation, a forensic evaluation of the complete wall system can be performed using the procedures of AAMA 511-08, Voluntary Guideline for Forensic Water Penetration Testing of Fenestration Products. The objective of this testing is to identify the leak paths by recreating the known water leaks through simulation of the weather events that produced the reported water penetration.

AAMA 511 expands on the investigative steps set forth in ASTM E2128, Standard Guide for Evaluating Water Leakage of Building Walls, which recommends a total of seven steps prior to actual testing, as well as post-testing steps. Pretest inspection and data gathering include a review of project documents, evaluation of the design concept, a review of service history and inspections – all aimed at developing a hypothesis for the source of the water intrusion. If necessary, an optional sill dam test can be used to further investigate the leak path.

The test methods are similar to those referenced in AAMA 502 for newly installed products, but have specific differences in preparation and data interpretation. For example, the process begins by calculating the differential air pressures that the suspect units experienced, based on actual weather data for the wind-driven rain conditions coinciding with observance of the original leak. This calculated pressure defines the test pressure to which the fenestration product is to be subjected during the actual investigative testing. If this calculated wind speed is greater than two-thirds of the rated WTP for the product, it may be that the product was not the most appropriate selection for the project.

Note that AAMA 502-08, AAMA 503-08 and AAMA 511-08 all require that the indicated field testing must be performed by an AAMA-accredited testing laboratory, i.e., one recognized as meeting the requirements of AAMA 204-98, Guidelines for AAMA Accreditation of Independent Laboratories Performing On-Site Testing of Fenestration Products.

AAMA documents may be obtained online from the AAMA Publications Store at www.aamanet.org.

About the Author: John Lewis is Technical Director of the American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA).


©2015 Copyright DC&D Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. | DCD Construction Magazine | Email: webmaster@dcd.com